It is an interesting debate. As party organizations are usually very different from one country to the other, I feel it is difficult to give a considered opinion on the LPC/YLC situation, but we can indeed learn from each other in order to find ways to give young people a stronger voice in our respective parties.
In our case, the party president, which is the most important figure during elections, is elected through a one member one vote system. This is considered to be the most fair. As the youth organization, we only give an advice through a press release and encourage our members to vote. Since so far, we have had elections with only one serious candidate for party president, this has not given rise to a lot of problem. Generally, the members of our party are quite young, so we do not really have a problem where we are face with an old, conservative base.
More important to party politics in Belgium is the way through which the party lists are made. Since we use PR, it is very important to get a high place on the list in order to get elected. Since this is decided on the national level, the party bureau has quite a lot of influence there. The party bureau has almost 30 members, of which 5 are the elected party positions (president, vice-presidents, treasurer,...), 5 are appointed by the MPs, 12 are appointed by the party council (almost 130 members) and 2 are appointed by the youth organization.
In addition, we have quotas: at least one quarter of the party bureau (and also the party council) should be of the least represented sex and at least one quarter should be younger than 30. So, as a youth organization, we are very well represented: we can appoint our members directly, but we can also get people elected to the party bureau through the system of quotas. They are not elected separately by the youth organization, but along with other candidates by all members. It happens frequently that young people top the vote anyways.
The most important dilemma for youth organizations is indeed if they want to directly influence their party through a statutory representation, or if they want to use other means to ensure that young people are being heard (i.e. being present at party congresses and trying to gain support there). This is closely linked to the topic of independence. I know that Jonge Democraten (NL) and Jong VLD (B) do not want to be represented in their party bureaus because of this, but nevertheless, they are usually quite successful in gaining access to high positions.
I'd very much like to hear experiences of other organizations on this topic.
Thomas Leys
IFLRY President