IFLRY - Help Make the UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to its mandates

Welcome to IFLRY Sign in | Register

IFLRY » Let's talk politics » Human Rights » Help Make the UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to its mandates

Help Make the UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to its mandates

02-15-2008, 2:59

expat101
Joined on 02-15-2008
Posts 4

Help Make the UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to its mandates

Reply Quote

Can you help with making the UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL more relevant and accountable to their mandate; they are free to reject my petition on admissibilty criteria but i am afraid they are covering up for a "western" country caught with HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

The ART OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND SLAVERY THRU INSTITUTIONALISED JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (urgent-action@ohchr.org) and ask them to register the attached petition so that it can be assessed for admissibility and merit.

This is a test case for equal access to the legal system for all Australia. As opinioned by HIGH COURT Judge Hayne, apparently Australian with SouthEast Asian Heritage, can not have their cases heard in the HIGH COURT under Australian Constitution;

The Underlying case is HUMAN RIGHTS violation from HREOC and HREOC president John von Doussa, matter as sent to the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (urgent-action@ohchr.org).

I ask that you do it to make the UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to the various mandate under it, quoting the date and name

Communication to: Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers

http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com

Postal address:
Special Procedures Division
c/o OHCHR-UNOG

8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland

Fax : +41 22 917 90 06
E-mail : SPDInfo@ohchr.org

COPY OF FAX SENT 24/01/2008

NOTE PLEASE DONT USE FAX No. FOR REPLIES

PLEASE INDICATE where this petition is at right now

BSc(hons, melb)

webmaster
http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com

Date:     Thursday, January 24, 2008

Communication to: Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers

Human Rights Council Complaint Procedure

Accordingly, ECOSOC resolution 1503 (XLVIII) of 27 May 1970 as revised by resolution 2000/3 of 19 June 2000, served as a working basis for the establishment of a new Complaint Procedure and was improved where necessary to ensure that the complaint procedure be impartial, objective, efficient, victims-oriented and conducted in a timely manner.

Review of the 1503 procedure

Pursuant to Council resolution 5/1, the Complaint Procedure is being established to address consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms occurring in any part of the world and under any circumstances.

It retains its confidential nature, with a view to enhancing cooperation with the State concerned. The procedure, inter alia, is to be victims-oriented and conducted in a timely manner.

After consulting the requirements established by each mandate for the submission of allegations, information can be submitted by fax to +41 22 917 90 06, by e-mail to urgent-action@ohchr.org , or by postal mail to:

OHCHR-UNOG
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland

"Special circumstances of urgency

As with the other procedures described, you may seek interim measures by the Committee to prevent irreparable damage while the communication is being considered. The basis for such a request by the Committee to a State party is rule 91(3) of the rules of procedure.
Additional pointers on the admissibility of your case

You should be aware that complaints to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination differ on two issues of admissibility from the general procedure outlined above. First, your complaint will not be considered inadmissible if the same matter is pending before or has been the subject of a decision by another international procedure. Second, as already emphasized, complaints brought after a six-month time limit will, as a rule, be declared inadmissible."

We request Special circumstances of Urgency so that Australian Citizens of all ethnicity can gain access to

a.    the law and legal system and

b.    Social Security Services; under Australian laws and Constitution;

In addition an innocent man Mr Phuong Ngo is in prison for lack of a fair trial; Mr 's example is clear example of the disregard for law and order , and the conspiracy to pervert justice.

Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008

Communication to: Special Rapporteur of
the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence
of Judges and Lawyers

After
consulting the requirements established by each mandate for the submission of
allegations, information can be submitted by fax to +41 22 917 90 06, by e-mail
to urgent-action@ohchr.org , or by postal mail to:

OHCHR-UNOG

8-14
Avenue de la Paix

1211
Geneva 10

Switzerland

With
application for Special circumstances of urgency or sensitivity due to
incarceration, and with regards to Article 5 (b) “The individual has
exhausted all available domestic remedies. This shall not be the rule where the
application of the remedies is unreasonably prolonged”.

This
petition is to be faxed and a copy to be emailed to the above address.

Should
the attachments fail to send properly please see the email;

Should
my English be inadequate, please contact me asap

1. Information concerning the author of the
communication

Name: First
name:

Nationality: Australian Profession: Medical Research/IT

Date
and place of birth: . Long Xien, Vietnam.

Present
address: .

Address
for exchange of confidential correspondence:

nwn.webmaster@gmail.com

Submitting the communication as:

(a) Victim of the Human Rights violation
or violations set forth below:

The overriding violation of my Civil Rights is
the denial of "access to a competent, independent and impartial tribunal and
court established by law" which, in Australia is governed by the
Australian Constitution and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act (Cth)
1986; as established as Constitutional
Law in Australia (see: Schedule 2, Constitutional enactments, NSW Imperial Acts
Application Act 1969 No 30). Further there is a conspiracy to pervert the
course of justice by perjury and fabricating court documents and conspiracy to
cause injury instructed by the Prime Minister and the Attorney General and the
President of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission;

The denial of my Civil and Human Rights has
resulted in:-

1. Conspiracy to Pervert of the Course
of Justice, perjury and denying of access to the Australian Constitution and
the Australian Laws (* Federal Court No. 491 of 2007)

2. Unlawful authority by the President
of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, John von Doussa (* Federal
Court No. 491 of 2007)

3. Unlawful
denial of access to remedy from violations of Human Rights and inhumane degradation
(* Federal Court No. 491 of 2007)

4. Conspiracy
to Pervert the Course of Justice , perjury and denying of access to the
Australian Constitution and the Australian Laws (* Administrative Appeals
tribunal No. 2007/1865)

(Where *)

II. Information
concerning the alleged victim(s) (if other than author)

Phuong Ngo community
worker

http://home.iprimus.com.au/dna_info/phreephuong/

PO Box 109, Glebe, NSW 2037

email phreephuong@hotmail.com

Vivian
Solon, Cornelia Rau, Tony Tran

Aborigines
Black deaths in Custody cases and other cases;

III. State
concerned/articles violated/domestic remedies

Australia and

United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

These
are the local (Federal) laws that give effect to Australia’s obligation to the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights